Nos derniers articles

This position paper outlines Insurance Europe’s feedback on the European Commission’s Digital Omnibus initiative, which seeks to streamline the complex regulatory environment for the insurance sector. The organization advocates for reducing administrative burdens by harmonizing rules across artificial intelligence, data protection, and cybersecurity. Key recommendations include delaying specific AI Act obligations to ensure technical readiness and clarifying GDPR definitions to foster innovation in automated decision-making. Additionally, the sources highlight the importance of a Single-Entry Point for reporting cyber incidents and the potential benefits of a European Business Wallet for secure digital authentication. Ultimately, the federation seeks a more coherent legislative framework that balances robust consumer protection with the operational flexibility needed for insurers to remain competitive.

This report examines the escalating systemic risks within the European and global financial landscapes between late 2025 and early 2026. Cyber and hybrid threats are identified as a primary concern, exacerbated by the sector's heavy reliance on a small number of critical ICT third-party providers like AWS. Market volatility is further fueled by stretched equity valuations in the technology and AI sectors, alongside structural vulnerabilities exposed by a major crypto-asset flash crash in October 2025. Additionally, the reports highlight macroeconomic uncertainties such as rising public debt, shifting trade policies, and the lack of transparency in the rapidly expanding private credit market. To counter these instabilities, authorities are focusing on regulatory frameworks like the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) to strengthen oversight and mitigate potential contagion. Efforts to improve operational resilience remain central to protecting investors and maintaining orderly markets amidst these diverse financial and technological pressures.

This final report from the European Banking Authority (EBA) introduces new Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) for the supervisory reporting of Third Country Branches (TCBs) operating within the European Union. Established under the CRD VI regulatory package, these standards create a harmonized framework to replace fragmented national rules and ensure effective oversight of foreign banking entities. The reporting requirements are structured around a proportionality principle, distinguishing between Class 1 and Class 2 branches to tailor the volume and frequency of data collection based on an entity's size and risk. Under the new mandate, branches must submit standardized templates covering their own financial and regulatory health, as well as critical information regarding their head undertakings and wider group activities. To ease the transition, the EBA has simplified several data requirements and set the initial reporting deadline for March 31, 2027. This initiative ultimately aims to strengthen financial stability and create a level playing field across the EU banking sector.

Le webinaire réunissant plus de 850 participants portait sur les points d’attention pour la prochaine campagne du questionnaire annuel QLB, les exercices de reporting préparatoires à l’AMLA (collecte C6P 2026 et simulation RAM, impliquant plus de 600 établissements français), ainsi que les projets de normes techniques de niveau 2 du Paquet AML6 soumis à consultation publique par l’AMLA (connaissance de la clientèle, définitions des relations d’affaires et sanctions). Le replay est disponible en ligne.

Insurance Europe, representing the European (re)insurance sector, published a statement on 27 February 2026 calling for a "stop-the-clock" on the implementation of the Insurance Recovery and Resolution Directive (IRRD), scheduled to apply from 30 January 2027. The organization expresses concerns over remaining uncertainties in the proposal's scope, definition of critical functions, and funding responsibilities, with only about one year left for preparation. It argues that the current framework risks being overly detailed and burdensome, exceeding international standards and potentially harming EU insurers' global competitiveness. Insurance Europe proposes ten measures to make the IRRD proportionate, clear, and workable, including postponing the timeline, phasing in requirements, scaling back reporting templates, adopting a risk-based approach, and conducting a full impact assessment.

This consultative document outlines a new initiative to organize its extensive library of regulatory guidance and industry practices. By transitioning from individual PDF documents to a consolidated modular framework, the Committee aims to improve the accessibility and long-term maintenance of these materials. This reorganization involves streamlining existing content by removing outdated or repetitive information, resulting in a substantial reduction of total guidance volume. The draft chapters cover diverse topics, ranging from risk management and operational resilience to the prevention of financial service abuse. While the structure is being modernized for a user-friendly online experience, the Committee emphasizes that these changes do not alter current policies or introduce new mandates. Stakeholders are invited to provide feedback on the clarity of the framework and the relevance of the included materials before the project is finalized in late 2026.

This is a consultation on revising joint guidelines for assessing the suitability of management body members and key function holders at EU banks and investment firms. Open until 25 May 2026, it is part of a broader “Suitability Package” that includes draft Regulatory Technical Standards on documentation requirements. The revisions aim to harmonize suitability assessments across the EU, reflect new Capital Requirements Directive requirements, clarify controls for third-country branches, link assessments with anti-money-laundering frameworks, and introduce simplification measures.
A public hearing is scheduled for 15 April 2026.

Ce retour sur la réunion de Place sur les Entreprises d'investissement (EI) détaille les exigences réglementaires et les modalités de supervision imposées par l'ACPR aux établissements financiers, en mettant l'accent sur la gouvernance interne et la gestion des risques. Il définit une séparation stricte entre les organes de surveillance et de direction, tout en exigeant une transparence totale sur l'actionnariat et les fonds propres.
Un volet majeur concerne la mise en conformité avec le règlement DORA, incluant la tenue d'un registre des services technologiques et des tests de résilience numérique. Le retour précisen également les protocoles de reporting via le portail OneGate et les critères d'évaluation de l'ICARAP pour garantir la solvabilité. Enfin, l'autorité souligne l'importance de la protection des fonds de la clientèle à travers des dispositifs de cantonnement rigoureux.

This report evaluates how competent authorities have implemented previous recommendations regarding ICT risk assessment within the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). The document highlights a significant shift in the regulatory landscape due to the application of DORA, which establishes a unified framework for financial sector resilience. According to the findings, supervisors have made notable progress by forming specialized ICT teams, enhancing technical expertise, and adopting automated monitoring tools. Furthermore, the report details the integration of ICT-specific guidelines into broader operational risk assessments to ensure a more cohesive supervisory approach. While most authorities have successfully adopted benchmarking and horizontal analysis, the EBA emphasizes that maintaining supervisory convergence remains an ongoing priority as technology evolves. Overall, the report confirms that the EU is moving toward a more harmonized and robust regime for managing digital risks in banking.

This document presents the formal evaluation of proposed simplifications to the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). While the EBA supports the overall goal of reducing the reporting burden for companies, it expresses significant concern that certain permanent reliefs and data omissions could lead to long-term information gaps. The authority argues that a lack of high-quality, quantitative sustainability data may hinder risk management, facilitate greenwashing, and ultimately threaten financial stability. To address these risks, the EBA recommends implementing time-limited transitions for specific disclosure exemptions to ensure companies eventually provide comprehensive metrics. Additionally, the EBA emphasizes the need for interoperability with global standards and calls for the retention of key indicators, such as greenhouse gas emissions intensity, to support informed investment decisions.