Nos derniers articles

Ces normes établissent les critères que les autorités de surveillance appliqueront pour identifier les (ré)assureurs tenus d'intégrer des analyses macroprudentielles dans leur évaluation interne des risques et de la solvabilité (ORSA) et dans l'application du principe de la personne prudente (PPP). Cette initiative s'inscrit dans le cadre de la révision de la directive Solvabilité II, visant à renforcer la stabilité financière du secteur.

L'approche de sélection retenue est hybride, combinant un critère quantitatif et des critères qualitatifs pour un ciblage précis. Le critère principal est un seuil de 20 milliards d'euros de total d'actifs, relevé en réponse aux retours des parties prenantes pour mieux garantir la proportionnalité. Il est complété par des critères qualitatifs (tels que l'interconnexion, le type d'activité, la substituabilité et le risque de liquidité). Ces derniers offrent aux superviseurs une flexibilité fondée sur le risque, leur permettant d'ajouter ou de retirer des entités afin de capturer les risques non liés à la seule taille de bilan et d'assurer une application judicieuse.
Le rapport final, incluant l'analyse d'impact et les retours de la consultation, a été soumis à la Commission européenne pour adoption formelle.

EIOPA has published its final report on the draft 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 (𝗥𝗧𝗦) that will shape how insurers integrate macroprudential risk into both the 𝗢𝗥𝗦𝗔 and the 𝗣𝗿𝘂𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗲 (𝗣𝗣𝗣). These RTS are a key outcome of the Solvency II review and aim to ensure consistent, proportionate application of the new macroprudential requirements across the EU.

At the heart of the RTS is a hybrid identification approach for determining which undertakings must perform enhanced macroprudential analyses:

🔹 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱

Insurers and groups with total assets above EUR 20 billion are presumptively in scope. This threshold—raised from the initially proposed EUR 12 billion after consultation—accounts for inflation and seeks to balance financial stability monitoring with regulatory burden.

🔹 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗸-𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗖𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮

Supervisors can add entities below the threshold or exclude those above it based on:

• Interconnectedness with the financial system

• Systemically relevant activities (e.g., derivatives use, common exposures, guarantees, VA products)

• Substitutability concerns

• Liquidity risk

• Duration mismatch, leverage, or reliance on illiquid/opaque assets (for PPP analyses)

This flexibility should ensure proportionality while maintaining a consistent baseline for supervisory convergence.

The RTS respond to new legislative mandates introduced by the 𝗦𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 𝗜𝗜 review (Directive (EU) 2025/24), which require insurers to consider both outside-in and inside-out risks—reflecting EIOPA’s view that systemic risk in insurance can emerge through direct failure of key players or through behaviors that amplify shocks across the market.

Public consultation (Oct 2024–Jan 2025) generated valuable feedback, particularly around the asset threshold and the challenge of assessing “inside-out” systemic risks. EIOPA’s final approach is intended to reflect these insights while staying true to its mandate: strengthening the macroprudential framework without imposing unnecessary burdens.

The desired result is a balanced, forward-looking framework that enhances supervisory dialogue, supports financial stability, and reinforces the link between micro- and macroprudential perspectives.

The final RTS have now been submitted to the European Commission for adoption.

This paper presents a unified framework for reinsurance markets with multiple insurers and reinsurers, using Choquet risk measures and nonlinear pricing. It identifies Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium as the optimal concept, proving contracts are rational and Pareto optimal, with insurer welfare gains over monopoly scenarios.

FERMA supports the EIOPA and ECB's proposal for a European public-private reinsurance scheme to address the natural catastrophe protection gap. While backing the risk-based premium model and the potential for price stability, FERMA emphasizes the need for reliable and consistent data collection across nations. They also highlight the importance of a sufficiently large EU pool to manage premium pricing, a clear regulatory framework avoiding unnecessary burdens, and mechanisms to encourage long-term private sector engagement beyond annual renewals. FERMA advocates for continuous consultation and leveraging the scheme to incentivize risk prevention.

EIOPA highlights the lack of consistent regulatory treatment for crypto assets in the (re)insurance sector, raising concerns about risk sensitivity. Current capital weight options may underestimate crypto risks. To ensure prudence, EIOPA proposes a uniform 100% capital requirement for all crypto holdings. This approach balances risk management with simplicity while acknowledging that future market growth may require revisions. A review of crypto treatment under Solvency II is recommended as the sector evolves.

The lack of risk transfer stems from structural forces that deter innovation in insurance policies, leading to inefficient risk management and hindering market development. Policy responses can help address these issues.

Elicitable functionals and consistent scoring functions aid in optimal forecasting but assume correct distributions, which is unrealistic. To address this, robust elicitable functionals account for small misspecifications using Kullback-Leibler divergence. These robust functionals maintain statistical properties and are applied in reinsurance and robust regression settings.

New estimators for generalized tail distortion (GTD) risk measures are proposed, based on first-order asymptotic expansions, offering simplicity and comparable or better performance than existing methods. A reinsurance premium principle using GTD risk measure is tested on car insurance claims data, suggesting its effectiveness in embedding safety loading in pricing to counter statistical uncertainty.

"An adverse development cover (ADC) is a form of an excess of loss reinsurance contract that provides coverage for future loss payments relating to claims incurred prior to a specified date… A framework for assessing the value of an ADC from the perspective of the ceding insurer is developed. This value assists in making decisions regarding the acquisition of an ADC, comparing available options on offer and accounting for the ADC under the IFRS17 accounting standard."

"This article provides an insightful overview of the challenges encountered by the #insuranceindustry when applying the requirements of #ifrs17 to #reinsurance contracts... By delving into specific challenges and offering potential solutions, the article aims to shed light on the intricacies of implementing IFRS 17 and the resulting mismatches in #financialreporting, including their impact on #solvencyii practices."