Nos derniers articles

The ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) have launched a public consultation on draft Joint Guidelines for ESG stress testing. These guidelines aim to standardize how banking and insurance sectors integrate environmental, social, and governance risks into supervisory stress tests. Key aspects include ¹ ² ³:
ESG Stress Testing Framework: Establishes a common approach for developing methodologies and standards across the EU's financial system.
Guidance on Stress Tests: Covers design, features, and organizational arrangements, including expertise, data management, and scenario analysis timelines.
Long-term Approach: Accommodates future advancements and data improvements, promoting consistency and effectiveness.
The consultation runs until September 19, 2025, allowing stakeholders to provide feedback on the draft guidelines ³.

This study examines how European insurance companies influence mutual fund stability, particularly during periods of significant net outflows. Utilizing Solvency II and Lipper/Eikon data, the study reveals that insurers exhibit contrarian trading behavior, purchasing fund shares when other investors divest, especially in fixed-income funds. This behavior is more pronounced for affiliated funds. The paper also finds that insurers' financial health, indicated by solvency ratios, impacts their ability to act as contrarian traders; lower solvency ratios correlate with fewer purchases during outflows. Funds with insurer investments demonstrate enhanced resilience, exhibiting lower flow-to-performance sensitivity and reduced flow volatility. The findings suggest insurers can mitigate investor runs, but their stabilizing influence may lessen under systemic stress affecting their own financial health.

The report underscores the robustness of Europe’s insurance, reinsurance, and pension sectors despite a volatile macroeconomic environment. Strong capital positions persist, with median Solvency II ratios slightly down but stable. Premium growth surged, with non-life up 8.2% and life at 13.8%. Profitability improved, with median return on assets at 0.7%. However, it points out that risks from exchange rate volatility, elevated interest rates, geopolitical tensions, and cyber threats require vigilant monitoring. It also notes significant US equity exposure, urging caution amid potential market corrections.

EIOPA has published the results of its first EU-coordinated mystery shopping exercise, assessing the sales process for insurance-based investment products (IBIPs) across eight EU member states. While distributors often provided relevant information, areas for improvement were identified in disclosure, transparency, and consumer outcomes. Key findings include inadequate provision of cost information and limited consideration of sustainability preferences. EIOPA Chair Petra Hielkema emphasized the need to explore a more outcome-oriented sales approach, focusing on simple and transparent products that offer value for consumers.

In 2024, despite global challenges like AI advancements, elections, geopolitical instability, climate events, and cyber threats, EIOPA focused on safeguarding the public interest in the European financial system. They successfully executed their work program, emphasizing sustainable insurance/pensions, digital transformation, consistent supervision, high-quality advice, and financial stability. EIOPA also initiated regulatory simplification, stressing prudence to maintain a robust framework, and will collaborate with the European Commission to enhance the Savings and Investment Union. Their ongoing commitment is to ensure a robust, resilient, and well-regulated industry for all stakeholders.

This study emphasizes the need for clearer, consumer-friendly disclosures in home insurance policies regarding natural catastrophe coverage. Despite some insurers providing accurate information, vague language and inconsistent definitions in Insurance Product Information Documents (IPIDs) often confuse consumers about coverage for events like floods or fires. With only a quarter of natural disaster losses insured in Europe, unclear disclosures contribute to a significant protection gap, leaving households vulnerable. EIOPA suggests improved IPID design, including detailed peril taxonomies and clear exclusion terms, to help consumers make informed decisions.

Insurance Europe responded to EIOPA's draft Opinion on AI governance in insurance, supporting clarity on existing rules but raising concerns over potential new obligations. It cautioned that the draft's language might lead to supervisory expectations being misinterpreted as binding requirements, conflicting with the EU's simplification goals for smaller firms. Insurance Europe also highlighted risks of dual supervision in some regions and emphasized the need for clear distinctions between different AI types and user roles. It urged EIOPA to focus on aligning the Opinion with established frameworks like Solvency II and GDPR for effective oversight.

“The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) has published the technical information on the symmetric adjustment of the equity capital charge for Solvency II with reference to the end of April 2025.”

EIOPA's April 2025 Insurance Risk Dashboard indicates stable, medium-level risks in the European insurance sector, though pockets of vulnerability exist due to geopolitical uncertainty and market volatility. Macroeconomic risks are stable but with concerning GDP growth and inflation forecasts. Credit risks remained stable until early April, when spreads widened slightly. Market risks are elevated due to bond and equity volatility. Liquidity, solvency, profitability, financial interlinkages, and insurance risks are stable. Market sentiment is medium risk, and ESG risks are steady but with an intensifying outlook due to shifting environmental agreements.

FERMA supports the EIOPA and ECB's proposal for a European public-private reinsurance scheme to address the natural catastrophe protection gap. While backing the risk-based premium model and the potential for price stability, FERMA emphasizes the need for reliable and consistent data collection across nations. They also highlight the importance of a sufficiently large EU pool to manage premium pricing, a clear regulatory framework avoiding unnecessary burdens, and mechanisms to encourage long-term private sector engagement beyond annual renewals. FERMA advocates for continuous consultation and leveraging the scheme to incentivize risk prevention.