Nos derniers articles

Cet article sur le rapport ESMA 2025 met en lumière les impératifs de conformité du reporting CSRD, en insistant sur la nécessaire harmonisation sémantique des impacts, risques et opportunités avec les normes ESRS pour garantir la transparence. Il souligne la priorité accordée au risque climatique, exigeant une cohérence stricte entre les plans de transition et la taxonomie européenne, tout en appelant à l'abandon des descriptions standardisées au profit d'une analyse de double matérialité ancrée dans la réalité opérationnelle des entreprises.

Cet article examine les failles structurelles de DORA, soulignant que le cadre actuel décourage la transparence sur les erreurs de gouvernance. L’auteur propose une nouvelle architecture à trois niveaux qui sépare distinctement la fonction d’apprentissage collectif de celle de la sanction réglementaire.

La publication par l’EBA du document de consultation EBA/CP/2026/07 marque un tournant décisif : le passage d'un reporting ESG exploratoire à un cadre permanent et rigoureux intégré au pilier prudentiel CRR3. Ce nouveau dispositif uniformise la collecte de données pour la supervision, tout en rationalisant les indicateurs hérités des collectes ad-hoc.

L’architecture repose sur un principe de proportionnalité à trois niveaux (complet, simplifié, réduit), permettant d'alléger la charge des petites institutions (SNCI) via un template unique, tout en imposant une granularité accrue aux grandes banques. Le template pivot D 01.00 aligne désormais le reporting sur les exigences des stress tests européens, intégrant des paramètres de crédit précis et une décomposition sectorielle NACE étendue.

L’innovation majeure réside dans l'élargissement du périmètre : l’introduction d’un module sur les risques environnementaux hors-climat (biodiversité, pollution) et le remplacement du "Top 20" par un suivi de la concentration au niveau de l'obligataire. Parallèlement, l'évaluation du risque physique s'automatise via l'intersection entre géolocalisation et cartes d'aléas, corrélant directement l'exposition climatique aux métriques de risque (PD, LGD).

À terme, cette réforme ambitionne une convergence avec le reporting FINREP et le Pilier 3. L'enjeu final demeure l'intégration des RWA (actifs pondérés par le risque) dans ce cadre, étape indispensable pour calibrer d'éventuels coussins de fonds propres systémiques liés au climat.

Le document EBA/CP/2026/07 du 10 avril 2026 réforme le reporting des pertes de risque opérationnel sous CRR3, en application de l'Article 317 du CRR.
Changement clé : passage d'un reporting agrégé à un reporting granulaire événement par événement via l'approche "Open Table". L'ancien COREP C 17.01/17.02 est abrogé et remplacé par un modèle unique C 17.01 semestriel.
Nouvelle taxonomie EBA/RTS/2025/03 : 7 types d'événements de Niveau 1, 26 catégories détaillées de Niveau 2, et 15 attributs. Ces attributs capturent les risques émergents ESG et DORA sans multiplier les catégories.
Calendrier : 2026, capture interne selon la nouvelle taxonomie. Mi-2026 à mi-2027, période transitoire avec reporting limité au Niveau 1. 30 septembre 2027, application des nouveaux ITS. 31 décembre 2027, premier reporting granulaire incluant un rattrapage rétroactif depuis 2026.
Proportionnalité : Seuils des articles 316 et 319 maintenus. Reporting volontaire possible pour SNCI et banques moyennes.
Historique : Collecte one-off fin 2027. Look-back 10 ans pour Niveau 1, 1 an minimum pour Niveau 2 et attributs.

L'EBA privilégie l'approche granulaire pour simplifier les retraitements et harmoniser le reporting européen.

EIOPA submitted draft amendments to two Implementing Technical Standards under Solvency II to the European Commission. The proposals incorporate changes from the Solvency II review and aim to reduce the reporting burden by at least 25% across sectors .The amendments include reducing the frequency of certain templates, deleting some annual templates, greater use of proportionality, and technical simplifications. EIOPA states these would lower quarterly templates by 26% for solo undertakings, annual templates by 30%, and data points by 22%, with higher reductions for small and non-complex undertakings.
EIOPA expresses the view that the changes would provide meaningful benefits without jeopardizing policyholder protection or financial stability. The new requirements are set to apply from 30 January 2027, with a transitional provision for 2026 annual reporting.

This final report from the European Banking Authority (EBA) introduces new Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) for the supervisory reporting of Third Country Branches (TCBs) operating within the European Union. Established under the CRD VI regulatory package, these standards create a harmonized framework to replace fragmented national rules and ensure effective oversight of foreign banking entities. The reporting requirements are structured around a proportionality principle, distinguishing between Class 1 and Class 2 branches to tailor the volume and frequency of data collection based on an entity's size and risk. Under the new mandate, branches must submit standardized templates covering their own financial and regulatory health, as well as critical information regarding their head undertakings and wider group activities. To ease the transition, the EBA has simplified several data requirements and set the initial reporting deadline for March 31, 2027. This initiative ultimately aims to strengthen financial stability and create a level playing field across the EU banking sector.

This document presents the formal evaluation of proposed simplifications to the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). While the EBA supports the overall goal of reducing the reporting burden for companies, it expresses significant concern that certain permanent reliefs and data omissions could lead to long-term information gaps. The authority argues that a lack of high-quality, quantitative sustainability data may hinder risk management, facilitate greenwashing, and ultimately threaten financial stability. To address these risks, the EBA recommends implementing time-limited transitions for specific disclosure exemptions to ensure companies eventually provide comprehensive metrics. Additionally, the EBA emphasizes the need for interoperability with global standards and calls for the retention of key indicators, such as greenhouse gas emissions intensity, to support informed investment decisions.

These Joint Guidelines on ESG Stress Testing provide a unified European framework for assessing how environmental, social, and governance risks impact the financial sector. These standards require competent authorities to evaluate both the short-term financial stability and long-term business model resilience of credit institutions and insurance firms. The methodology initially prioritizes climate-related environmental risks, examining both physical threats like weather events and transition risks such as policy shifts. To ensure practical application, the guidelines emphasize proportionality and materiality, allowing for simplified approaches based on the size and complexity of the entity. 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗝𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝟭, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟳, following a refinement process that integrated public feedback on data granularity and scenario timelines. Ultimately, the guidelines aim to foster supervisory consistency across the EU while adapting to the evolving maturity of ESG data and modeling.

This comprehensive report from 𝗘𝗜𝗢𝗣𝗔 provides a 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄-𝘂𝗽 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴, assessing the progress made by 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 (𝗡𝗦𝗔𝘀) in strengthening their oversight of 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿. It details the 𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆 used, the 𝘀𝗰𝗼𝗽𝗲 of the review, and the 𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮 applied to recommended actions. The document highlights 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 by NSAs in areas such as 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀, 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁, with many recommended actions being 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱. However, it also identifies 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗴𝗮𝗽𝘀, particularly in 𝗼𝗳𝗳-𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 and the 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀, emphasizing the need for 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗱 𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲𝘀 to ensure effective and continuous oversight of outsourcing arrangements.

This consultation paper, issued by EIOPA, outlines proposed 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 (𝗜𝗧𝗦) concerning resolution reporting for insurance and reinsurance companies as mandated by 𝗗𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 (𝗘𝗨) 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱/𝟭. It details the 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀, 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 for insurers to provide information essential for drawing up and executing resolution plans. The document includes an 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 evaluating policy options for 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 and the 𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴, ultimately favoring less frequent and less granular reporting to reduce the burden on undertakings. Additionally, it addresses 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗱𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, emphasizing cooperation between supervisory and resolution authorities and providing a 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 regarding data collection.
𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲 22 July 2025
𝗗𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 31 October 2025, 23:59 (CET)