Nos derniers articles

This paper introduces an 𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗵𝘆𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 designed to cover 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝘃𝘆-𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗹𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀, which are extreme and potentially limitless financial damages, often associated with natural disasters. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗯𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆-𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿 𝗹𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰 (𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗲𝘅-𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱) 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗿, 𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗶𝗰 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀. A key contribution is the development of a 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗼𝗻 and a 𝘁𝘄𝗼-𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗯𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆 that can leverage readily available covariate data, even when comprehensive loss data is scarce. Empirical analysis using both 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹-𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗼 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 demonstrates that 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝘆𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀 by providing better coverage for the same premium, especially benefiting regions with limited data. The authors highlight the practical advantages of 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 and 𝗿𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀 offered by the parametric component.

This academic paper proposes these 𝗸𝗲𝘆 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀:

• The analysis provides a framework for introducing index insurance in competition with traditional products, emphasizing demand and solvency.

• Key drivers for index insurance demand are policyholder risk aversion, compensation speed advantage over traditional products, and its pricing (loading factor).

• The proposed hybrid product effectively balances the strengths of both insurance types by applying index insurance where it is “most suitable for policyholders,” accelerating compensation, and potentially reducing premiums.

• The methodology can help insurers identify specific loss types for which index compensation is preferred, optimizing portfolio structure and claims management.

• Future work will address modeling demand for index insurance in situations where traditional indemnity-based insurance is unavailable, requiring a “more nuanced approach to calibrate the utility function.”

This consultation package is aimed at easing the reporting burden on insurance and reinsurance companies under the Solvency II framework. The proposed amendments seek to reduce reporting requirements by at least 26% for solo undertakings and 36% for small and non-complex undertakings. Key changes include reducing template frequency, deleting annual templates, and introducing technical simplifications. The EIOPA expects these changes to substantially reduce the burden on European insurers without compromising policyholder protection or financial stability. Stakeholders can provide feedback via the EU Survey until October 10, 2025.

This report examines how European (re)insurers address biodiversity risks, which threaten financial stability due to their complexity and links with climate risks. Despite challenges in quantifying impacts, one in five insurers references biodiversity in their risk assessments, though mostly qualitatively. Promising practices show growing awareness, but regional variations and limited metrics hinder progress. EIOPA calls for enhanced collaboration to improve data, models, and risk management, emphasizing the need to better understand the climate-biodiversity nexus and explore nature-based solutions to address insurance gaps.

This study examines how European insurance companies influence mutual fund stability, particularly during periods of significant net outflows. Utilizing Solvency II and Lipper/Eikon data, the study reveals that insurers exhibit contrarian trading behavior, purchasing fund shares when other investors divest, especially in fixed-income funds. This behavior is more pronounced for affiliated funds. The paper also finds that insurers' financial health, indicated by solvency ratios, impacts their ability to act as contrarian traders; lower solvency ratios correlate with fewer purchases during outflows. Funds with insurer investments demonstrate enhanced resilience, exhibiting lower flow-to-performance sensitivity and reduced flow volatility. The findings suggest insurers can mitigate investor runs, but their stabilizing influence may lessen under systemic stress affecting their own financial health.

The report underscores the robustness of Europe’s insurance, reinsurance, and pension sectors despite a volatile macroeconomic environment. Strong capital positions persist, with median Solvency II ratios slightly down but stable. Premium growth surged, with non-life up 8.2% and life at 13.8%. Profitability improved, with median return on assets at 0.7%. However, it points out that risks from exchange rate volatility, elevated interest rates, geopolitical tensions, and cyber threats require vigilant monitoring. It also notes significant US equity exposure, urging caution amid potential market corrections.

EIOPA has published the results of its first EU-coordinated mystery shopping exercise, assessing the sales process for insurance-based investment products (IBIPs) across eight EU member states. While distributors often provided relevant information, areas for improvement were identified in disclosure, transparency, and consumer outcomes. Key findings include inadequate provision of cost information and limited consideration of sustainability preferences. EIOPA Chair Petra Hielkema emphasized the need to explore a more outcome-oriented sales approach, focusing on simple and transparent products that offer value for consumers.

The BCBS has introduced a voluntary framework for jurisdictions to disclose climate-related financial risks. This framework blends qualitative and quantitative data for a comprehensive view of bank exposures, while offering flexibility due to evolving data. It encourages a holistic approach to understanding disclosure strengths and weaknesses. Implementation is left to individual jurisdictions, and the Committee will monitor developments to update the framework as needed.

In 2024, despite global challenges like AI advancements, elections, geopolitical instability, climate events, and cyber threats, EIOPA focused on safeguarding the public interest in the European financial system. They successfully executed their work program, emphasizing sustainable insurance/pensions, digital transformation, consistent supervision, high-quality advice, and financial stability. EIOPA also initiated regulatory simplification, stressing prudence to maintain a robust framework, and will collaborate with the European Commission to enhance the Savings and Investment Union. Their ongoing commitment is to ensure a robust, resilient, and well-regulated industry for all stakeholders.

Insurance Europe calls on the EU to simplify the Retail Investment Strategy (RIS) to improve consumer access to investment, protection, and advice. Their recommendations include streamlining the "value for money" assessment by allowing supervisors to use benchmarks without requiring peer grouping by insurers and avoiding new reporting. They also advocate for a smoother consumer journey by shortening suitability tests and removing duplicative inducement tests. Finally, they propose reducing information overload by focusing on key disclosures and avoiding overly technical cost details. These simplifications, they argue, will boost investment and EU competitiveness.