Nos derniers articles

The guide emphasizes a foundational set of principles that apply across all risk types. These include robust governance, comprehensive documentation, sound data management, and effective model risk management.

The preprint article, 𝘿𝙤 𝘽𝙖𝙣𝙠𝙨 𝙎𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙠 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙀𝙎𝙂 𝙇𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙪𝙖𝙜𝙚? 𝘼 𝙏𝙚𝙭𝙩-𝘽𝙖𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝘾𝙡𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝘼𝙥𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙖𝙘𝙝 explores the 𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 in ESG disclosures among leading Italian banks. The authors, Giuseppe Scandurra and Antonio Thomas, employed 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 and 𝗵𝗶𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 to analyze the textual content of non-financial reports. Their research identifies 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗰𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀 among the banks: 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱, 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹, 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗹, and 𝗶𝗱𝗶𝗼𝘀𝘆𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰. This 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆 in how banks communicate their ESG efforts, despite calls for harmonization. Ultimately, the study highlights the 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗘𝗦𝗚 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 due to varied reporting styles and suggests a need for more specific standards within the banking sector.

The ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) have launched a public consultation on draft Joint Guidelines for ESG stress testing. These guidelines aim to standardize how banking and insurance sectors integrate environmental, social, and governance risks into supervisory stress tests. Key aspects include:
ESG Stress Testing Framework: Establishes a common approach for developing methodologies and standards across the EU's financial system.
Guidance on Stress Tests: Covers design, features, and organizational arrangements, including expertise, data management, and scenario analysis timelines.
Long-term Approach: Accommodates future advancements and data improvements, promoting consistency and effectiveness.
The consultation runs until September 19, 2025, allowing stakeholders to provide feedback on the draft guidelines.

The German and European banking sector is undergoing rapid transformation due to digitalization, ESG integration, regulatory changes, demographic shifts, and increased competition from FinTechs. Key challenges include managing complexity, leveraging AI and data, optimizing business models, and ensuring resilience and security. Banks must adapt quickly to survive, with successful integration of AI and ESG being crucial. Consolidation and evolution towards technology-driven or platform-based approaches are likely. Banks face a "transformation trilemma" of managing digital, regulatory, and ESG changes while maintaining profitability.
THE PAPER IS IN GERMAN

Banks’ digital accessibility communication varies, reflecting strategic priorities. ING and Santander proactively integrate it into long-term goals, while Deutsche Bank focuses on compliance, often superficially. Société Générale aspires to improve, but gaps persist between claims and action. Swedbank and Danske Bank offer limited transparency, prioritizing sustainability over accessibility. This fragmentation highlights differing stakeholder pressures and strategic ambitions, suggesting a need for stronger collaboration to embed inclusivity beyond compliance in self-service banking.

Increased cyber risk drives U.S. banks to diversify information sources, especially large, nationally chartered banks. This suggests cyber threats erode data confidence, forcing banks to seek verification. Specialized institutions are more vulnerable to data integrity disruptions.

“In this report we look at the steps taken by banks and insurers since 2021 to respond to the impacts of climate change, and we set out how our regulatory work has evolved in that period. We also look ahead to the planned release, later in 2025, of a consultation paper seeking views on an update to our supervisory statement (SS) 3/19.”

The SRB updated its operational continuity in resolution (OCIR) guidance. It clarifies expectations for banks on service identification, risk assessment, and mitigation measures like resilient contracts and robust IT systems. The revisions align with recent frameworks like DORA and EBA guidelines. Minor additions will be applied from the 2026 resolution planning cycle, pending further regulatory developments.

“We argue that cyber and other financial shocks cannot be treated as uncorrelated vulnerabilities and policy solutions for cyber vulnerability need to be calibrated for adverse financial conditions.”

The study finds that banks engaging in greenwashing practices contribute to increased systemic risk, especially larger and less efficient ones. The market values actual ESG performance more than disclosures, and strong environmental performance helps mitigate this risk.