Nos derniers articles

Europe is facing an unprecedented surge in cyber threats. Malware targeting banking apps alone has grown 200% year-on-year, with affected applications tripling from 600 to 1,800. These numbers reflect a simple truth: cybersecurity is no longer just a tech challenge—it’s a talent challenge.

Despite growing investments, Europe’s cybersecurity skills gap continues to widen, leaving our digital ecosystem exposed. Today, this shortage of skilled professionals is arguably our single greatest vulnerability.

To close this gap, ENISA introduced the European Cybersecurity Skills Framework (ECSF)—a much-needed step toward a common skills language across Member States. Its ambition is right. Its mission is essential. But its practical impact remains limited.

A recent structural analysis highlights six critical gaps holding the ECSF back:

🔹 No seniority levels, making career pathways unclear

🔹 Weak links between tasks, skills, and knowledge, complicating curriculum design

🔹 No graded proficiency levels, limiting meaningful assessment

🔹 Inconsistent role definitions, misaligned with real-world job functions

🔹 Flat, unstructured knowledge lists, difficult to reuse or map

🔹 Lack of scalable coding, hindering interoperability with frameworks like NICE, SFIA, and CyBOK

The good news? These issues are solvable.

A smarter, next-generation ECSF could be built by:

1️⃣ Introducing hierarchical categories for tasks, skills, and knowledge

2️⃣ Defining explicit links between them

3️⃣ Integrating competence tiers

4️⃣ Adding junior–mid–senior levels

5️⃣ Creating a modular structure for emerging domains

6️⃣ Mapping skills directly to training and certifications

This is more than framework design—it’s a strategic investment in Europe’s digital sovereignty. A coherent ECSF empowers educators, enables precise hiring, enhances mobility across Member States, and builds the coordinated workforce we urgently need.

Integrating Cyber Security (CS) with Enterprise Architecture (EA) offers a holistic approach to managing complex cyber risks. This study, through literature review, focus groups, and interviews, identified four key integration strategies: embedding CS in EA frameworks, leveraging agile secure development, enhancing knowledge exchange, and aligning CS/EA functions. Implementing these can improve Cyber Risk Management efficiency and reliability.

Optimizing cybersecurity involves understanding it as an organizational concern with varying stakeholder perspectives. Instead of viewing it as a standalone issue, decision-makers should align security measures with business goals. This paper proposes a model considering organizational priorities, translating them into a utility function for evaluating security controls, and finding an optimal balance between risk, cost, and benefit.