The study exploits Basel III's sequential adoption and ultimate parent rule, creating two bank groups under different regulations in the same country: early-adopting subsidiaries (treated banks) and domestic banks (untreated). Using a difference-in-difference approach, it empirically identifies Basel III effects by comparing risk and performance changes before and after the 2015 implementation in non-adopting countries.
top of page
Rechercher
Posts récents
Voir toutThe main vulnerability in data protection is ineffective risk management, often subjective and superficial. GDPR outlines what to achieve...
00
This paper introduces a dynamic, proactive cyber risk assessment methodology that combines internal and external data, converting...
10
Cybersecurity investment models often mislead practitioners due to unreliable data, unverified assumptions, and false premises. These...
00
bottom of page
Комментарии