"We respond to Tetlock et al. (2022) showing 1) how expert judgment fails to reflect tail risk, 2) the lack of compatibility between forecasting tournaments and tail risk assessment methods (such as extreme value theory). More importantly, we communicate a new result showing a greater gap between the properties of tail expectation and those of the corresponding probability."
top of page
Rechercher
Posts récents
Voir toutExplainable AI (XAI) is becoming increasingly important, especially in fields like fraud detection. Differentiable Inductive Logic...
00
This study analyzes tone consistency in bank risk disclosures from regulatory Pillar 3 reports and annual IFRS reports. Findings indicate...
00
The paper examines climate litigation's growing impact on banks, noting limited current effects but a projected increase. Key risks...
00
bottom of page
Comments